Table of Contents
Tulu Gets Second Additional Administrative Language Status in Karnataka
Introduction
- Cabinet Approval: The Karnataka Cabinet on 18 September 2026 approved Tulu as the state’s second additional administrative language in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi districts. The decision was announced by Chief Minister D. K. Shivakumar after a Cabinet meeting held in Mangaluru.
- Long Demand: The decision fulfils a long-standing demand for greater official recognition of Tulu, particularly from people, organisations and cultural groups in Karnataka’s coastal region.
What the Decision Means
- Administrative Use: Tulu will receive additional administrative use in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi districts. The Cabinet note describes it as the state’s “second additional administrative language”, while Kannada continues as Karnataka’s existing official language.
- District Implementation: The district administrations of Dakshina Kannada and Udupi will implement the decision. The government has planned an annual allocation of ₹82 lakh for translation, language training and other activities connected with the administrative use of Tulu.
About the Tulu Language
- Dravidian Language: Tulu is a Dravidian language with a history of more than 2,000 years. It is mainly spoken in the coastal parts of Karnataka, particularly Dakshina Kannada and Udupi, and is also spoken in neighbouring regions.
- Cultural Region: The language is closely associated with the coastal cultural region commonly known as Tulunadu. Tulu has an important place in the region’s folklore, theatre, rituals, literature and everyday communication.
- Large Community: Tulu is spoken by a large population in India and among communities living outside India. The language has a strong cultural presence despite previously having limited formal administrative recognition in Karnataka.
Long-Standing Demand for Recognition
- Community Demand: Tulu-speaking communities, cultural organisations, public representatives and other groups have for many years demanded greater official recognition for the language and its wider use in public administration.
- Expert Committee: The demand had also been examined through reports and recommendations from experts and officials. A committee headed by academician Mohan Alva had earlier examined the proposal for giving Tulu greater official recognition.
- Assembly Discussion: The issue had also been raised in the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, showing that the question of Tulu’s official recognition had remained under discussion for several years before the latest Cabinet decision.
Why the Decision Is Important
- Cultural Recognition: The decision gives greater official recognition to a language that has a strong historical and cultural connection with Karnataka’s coastal region. It may contribute to the preservation and promotion of Tulu’s linguistic heritage.
- Administrative Development: The new status can support the use of Tulu in local administrative activities in the two designated districts. The allocation for translation and training is intended to help government departments implement the decision.
- Educational Potential: Chief Minister D. K. Shivakumar said Tulu has potential for educational and cultural growth. The recognition may therefore provide greater opportunities for the language in educational and cultural activities.
Difference from Eighth Schedule Recognition
- Separate Status: The Karnataka Cabinet’s decision to give Tulu additional administrative-language status should not be confused with inclusion in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution. These are separate forms of recognition.
- Constitutional List: The Eighth Schedule currently contains 22 constitutionally recognised languages, and Tulu is not included in that list. Therefore, the Karnataka decision does not by itself give Tulu Eighth Schedule status.
- Continuing Demand: Tulu organisations have separately demanded the inclusion of Tulu in the Eighth Schedule. That constitutional demand remains different from the administrative recognition granted by the Karnataka government.
Wider Decisions at the Mangaluru Cabinet Meeting
- Development Projects: The Cabinet meeting in Mangaluru also approved development proposals worth approximately ₹32,611 crore. These proposals covered rural development, infrastructure and projects for the coastal region.
- Tourism Policy: The government announced the Coastal-Malnad Karnataka Tourism Policy 2026. The policy proposes treating tourism projects in the coastal and Malnad regions as infrastructure projects and providing incentives to encourage investment.
- Fisheries Park: A 150-acre fisheries park was among the projects approved during the Cabinet meeting. The wider package was presented as part of development efforts for Karnataka’s coastal region.
Other Developments in the Region
- District Renaming: The government also discussed a proposal to rename Dakshina Kannada district as Mangaluru district. The proposal is separate from the Tulu language decision.
- Public Opinion: The government said that public opinion would be collected on the proposed renaming, along with a formal discussion, before a decision is taken.
- Regional Development: The Cabinet meeting also included several proposals concerning tourism, fisheries, infrastructure and other development activities in Karnataka’s coastal region.
Important Questions
- When did the Karnataka Cabinet approve Tulu as the state’s second additional administrative language?
- In which two Karnataka districts will Tulu have additional administrative status?
- What amount has the Karnataka government allocated annually for translation, training and other activities related to Tulu?
- How is Tulu’s additional administrative status different from inclusion in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution?
- What other major development decisions were taken at the Cabinet meeting held in Mangaluru?
Conclusion
The recognition of Tulu as Karnataka’s second additional administrative language in Dakshina Kannada and Udupi marks a new stage in the official recognition of the language. It gives Tulu an administrative role in the two coastal districts while retaining Kannada’s existing position. The decision also reflects the continuing efforts of Tulu-speaking communities and organisations to obtain greater linguistic and cultural recognition. The separate demand for Eighth Schedule inclusion remains an issue beyond this state-level administrative decision. It may further strengthen Tulu’s preservation, promotion and future development.
3



